办 公:

手 机:

主页 > 新闻动态 > 婚姻调查 > 文章详情

离婚诉讼的技巧策略

发布时间:2019-01-18 16:05
每一个人都不愿意遇到离婚官司,如果不幸遇到,一般也只有一次。因此,绝大多数当事人在打离婚官司时,是第一次上法庭,对于冗杂的法律程序,以及复杂的举证规则,许多当事人往往云里雾里,不知如何处理。
 
Everyone is reluctant to face a divorce lawsuit, if unfortunately encountered, usually only once. Therefore, the vast majority of the parties in the divorce case, is the first time to go to court, for the complicated legal procedures, as well as complex rules of proof, many parties are often in a fog, do not know how to deal with.
 
 
 
一、上法院打“官司”之前,首先应做好准备工作。
 
First, before going to court to fight a lawsuit, we should first make preparations.
 
 
 
主要体现在二个方面:
 
It is mainly reflected in two aspects:
 
 
 
其一,诉讼证据的准备;
 
First, the preparation of litigation evidence;
 
 
 
其二,家庭财产的保护。
 
Second, the protection of family property.
 
 
 
对于绝大多数当事人来说,由于第一次诉讼,因此,没有收集、整理证据的意识。但法院审理案件,诉讼中心围绕“证据”进行,没有证据,往往是“有理但打不赢官司”。比如,刘女因不能忍受张男对其长期实施的,欲向法院提起。在提起离婚前,应当先有意识地收集相关存在家庭暴力的证据。比如,张男对其施暴后留下的伤痕照片、报警电话记录或警署笔录,或居委会的证言,验伤单据,证人证言等。如果刘女在张男每次殴打后,不报警、不验伤、忍气吞声,抱着“家丑不可外扬”的思想,不能举出相关证据,她的诉讼请求很难得到法院的支持。因此,围绕自己的诉讼请求收集相关证据,在起诉之前是非常重要的,盲目起诉,往往“欲速而不达”。
 
For the vast majority of parties, because of the first lawsuit, there is no awareness of collecting and collating evidence. But when the court hears a case, the litigation center centers around "evidence", without evidence, often "reasonable but not win a lawsuit". For example, Liu Nv wanted to bring it to court because she couldn't stand Zhang Man's long-term implementation. Before filing for divorce, evidence of domestic violence should be collected consciously. For example, photographs of wounds left by Zhang after his violence, telephone records or police records, or the testimony of neighborhood committees, injury certificates, witness testimony, etc. If Liu Nv does not report to the police, test wounds or swallow her voice after each beating, and holds the idea of "family ugliness should not be publicized", she can not cite relevant evidence, so it is very difficult for her claim to be supported by the court. Therefore, it is very important to collect relevant evidence around one's own lawsuit request before prosecution. Blind prosecution is often "hasty but not speedy".
 
 
 
一方起诉后,另一方往往会闻风而动,转移家庭共同财产。因此,在起诉前,先不要打草惊蛇,先不露声色地将的相关证据进行收集和整理。比如,公司股东出资或权证的收集,相关财务报表的收集,存折的开户行、账号,另一方股市的股东账号,房屋产权证的复印件、贵重金银首饰的保护,家庭共同财产的发票或录像等。在必要时,甚至可以采用诉讼保全的措施。
 
After one party sues, the other party often moves and transfers the family's common property. Therefore, before the prosecution, do not frighten the snake, first collect and sort out the relevant evidence without appearing. For example, the collection of company shareholders'investment or warrants, the collection of relevant financial statements, the opening bank and account number of the passbook, the shareholders' account number of the other side's stock market, the copy of the house property certificate, the protection of precious gold and silver jewelry, invoices or videos of family common property, etc. When necessary, we can even adopt the measures of litigation preservation.
 
 
 
二、接到法院传票时,不要紧张,要针对对方诉求收集相反证据,并进行答辩准备。
 
2. When receiving a subpoena from the court, don't be nervous. We should collect evidence against the other party's appeal and prepare for a defense.
 
 
 
很多当事人在接到法院传票时,往往非常紧张。特别在看到原告“歪曲事实”的起诉状后,即紧张,又气愤,又担心法院会听信原告一方之言。其实这是大可不必的,法院一般只是在开庭时,才会认真听取原告的诉讼请求和意见,对于原告的诉状内容,也只是一看了之,不会轻信。但被告应针对原告的诉状内容及提供的证据,收集相关的反证。
 
Many parties are often very nervous when they receive court summons. Especially after seeing the plaintiff's indictment of "distorting facts", he was nervous and angry, and worried that the court would listen to the plaintiff's words. In fact, this is not necessary. Courts usually listen carefully to the plaintiff's claims and opinions only when they are in court. They just look at the content of the plaintiff's pleadings and won't be credulous. However, the defendant should collect relevant counterevidence against the content of the plaintiff's complaint and the evidence provided.
 
 
 
很多被告认为,“第一次离婚诉讼,只要我坚持反对离婚,法院就不会判离”。其实这种观点是片面的。在原告已向法院提交大量证明夫妻感情确已破裂的前提下,如果被告仅仅是口头辩解,法院是否判决离婚就很难讲了。打官司是一件很严肃的事,任何一方都不能凭经验办事,也不可掉以轻心。
 
Many defendants believe that "in the first divorce lawsuit, as long as I insist on opposing divorce, the court will not divorce". In fact, this view is one-sided. On the premise that the plaintiff has submitted a large number of proof to the court that the relationship between husband and wife has indeed broken down, it is difficult for the court to decide whether to divorce if the defendant merely defends orally. It is a very serious matter to fight a lawsuit. Neither party can act on experience nor take it lightly.

关于我们| 新闻动态| 成功案例| 收费标准| 服务范围| 联系我们|

Copyright © 2002-2017 DEDECMS. 上海腾达商务调查公司 版权所有